We have a data wall!



In PLTs we discussed what were our non-negotiables in sentence structure from the writing progressions. What did we believe was essential. It became evident at this point that all indicators within CrT were informing our judgements, but staff still wanted to create the wall around this micro level before expanding into the use of the whole CrT indicators. We focused our attention within 'text forms and features.'


After each team agreed on their non-negotiables, these were then shared at the next PLT. Did we now still agree on our non-negotiables around sentence structure (in light of what teams have chosen before and after)? Do we see the continuum and are able to make comparisons so that we can move students along and back?


Teams then created an explanation of the indicators and developed student examples in light of what the progression indicators were wanting. These were also shared with teams across the school and amendments were made accordingly.


What percentage do we believe students need to achieve in this space to be at a specific level? We were guided by the 80% that instructional leaders have used in the past. Each team (including their Teacher Assistant) then spent time plotting their students, bringing to mind multiple samples of work from across the KLA's (not just English writing time). Immediately a conversation followed once the team had the opportunity to step back - what do we notice, what do we wonder?


As our LC meet next week we plan to reflect on the following:


- What did you think about the process other schools undertook (shared via email)? What did we learn from them? In-put gained from our EO's to avoid looping.


- What are our Challenges? i.e. The want for benchmark placing.


- Our Data Cards - what else do we need to know about each student?


- What whole school practices do we need to develop as a school around the wall?


(Parameters we could consider: How often do we look at the wall (twice a term? Every PLT) - few weeks for progress and to teach what is next. To ensure USE and ACCOUNTABILITY TO GROWTH.


- When do we move students? At least 3 samples before moving? More if possible. Evidence of growth needs to be verbalized and agreed upon?


- What data do we use? What is our understanding of current data (the last 3-4 weeks)?
Photo

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Revising the Parameter 1 and 14

Image
 Staff were asked to re-reflect on  Parameter 1 and the shared beliefs and understandings articulated by Lyn Sharrat. We had completed this same activity 12 months earlier and wanted to gain a sense of where we were placed collectively. Staff were asked to give a rating from 1 to 10 to indicate how much they believed in each of the statements and were encouraged to give a reason as to why they believed what they did. These ratings and reasons were collected anonymously. Then redistributed. Staff then stood behind the chairs, reading out the rating and reason they had been handed.  The photo below indicates where staff now sit with the statement: All leaders, teachers and students can articulate what they do and why they lead, teach and learn the way they do. The photos below are the staff's reaction to: High expectations and early and ongoing intervention are essential. The photos below are of staff's reaction to: All teachers can teach to high standards given time and th...
Read more

Establishment of the SAIP for 2024

Image
After reviewing data from the Tell Them From Me Survey, NAPLAN, the data wall movement concerning Learning Progressions, and the focus of every Case Management meeting in 2023 around sentence structure, it became evident that there was a significant need to focus on improving student outcomes in sentence formation. Based on these findings, the School’s Annual Improvement Plan (SAIP) for Learning and Teaching was set to center on this goal. The Learning and Teaching Action Team, in consultation with staff and the Learning Collaborative Team, developed specific actions to address this goal and agreed on measurable indicators of success. The team also sought support from the Catholic Schools Office, which provided guidance and supply of some professional learning, recognizing that other schools in the region were also prioritizing similar goals around writing and sentence structure. Despite positive trends in the Diocesan writing data, the school acknowledged that continued investment i...
Read more

Going back to the Data Wall

Image
The following staff meeting was presented by the Learning Collaborative team. Time was spent selecting students for the next CMM. Teachers completed a Chronicle entry using the Case Management Meeting template on Compass . There was also a d iscussion of support such as Drew’s time (Thursday 9:00am - 10:00am). His time can be booked to release staff for Learning Collaborative engagement and a timetable for purpose and booking was shared.  Kim Post shared how her time has been used by staff and announced her availability continues (Monday to Thursday 9:00am - 11:00am). Staff shared how she had modeled the unpacking of Learning Intentions, co-constructed Success Criteria with students, and coached teachers around the construction of BIU walls and anchor charts that support student learning. Moving forward, she might be utilised as an extra set of hands in training students how to use the wall and effectively find stars and stairs in their own and others work. This staff meeting high...
Read more